Go to the homepage - JurisSolutions: Expert Witnesses, Independent Medical Exams, IMEs, Evaluations, Expert witness directory, Expert Testimony, National Referrals, Database Search.
JurisSolutions logo: Expert Witnesses, Independent Medical Evaluations, IMEs, Expert witness directory, Expert Testimony, National Referrals, Database Search. Space next to logo: Expert Witness Referrals Directory and Independent Medical Exams. Home: Expert Witnesses for testimony and Independent Medical Exams, IMEs; referral directory.
Schedule an Independent
Medical Evaluation
(IME exam) online right now.
Space under Independent Medical Examination link to online referral/request form.
Expert Witness information on testimony and our services. Frequently Asked Questions about expert witness consulting and Independent Medical Evaluations/IME's
For info on independent medical exams, expert witness consulting and our directory or referrals, click the logo above. For info on independent medical exams, expert witness consulting and our directory or referrals, click the logo above. For info on independent medical exams, expert witness consulting and our directory or referrals, click the logo above.
Home: Expert Witnesses for testimony and Independent Medical Exams, IMEs; expert witness directory, national referrals, database search.
Expert Services, find the expert you need right now.
Independent Medical Exams / Evaluations; IME info and online referral / request form.
Search our online expert witness directory of medical, scientific, and technical experts.
Articles and Information
Experts, Join our expert witness directory for IMEs, testimony, and other referrals.
About Us, experts on expert witness consulting / referrals and Independent Medical Exams.
Contact Us and put your expert witness needs in our expert hands.


Enter city or
US Zip

Search Engines
Alta Vista
Meta Searches
Text to find:

Medical and legal research spacer
More Tools, including Legal and Medical resources can be found on our JurisResearch page.

Don’t Take Experts From Strangers
Be leery of consultants charging
contingency fees for finding expert witnesses

By Elizabeth J. Cohen

Expert witness locator services are springing up all over. They offer to find an expert in whatever specialty is needed in a particular case. A consultant approaches a lawyer directly, with a potential plaintiff as well as a potential expert. The service agrees to pay its experts on an hourly basis but requires a contingency fee from the lawyer.

Common-law rules in most states prohibit compensating an expert witness on a contingency fee basis. What about the consultant?

Conditions Attached

Early state ethics opinions, mostly from the 1980’s, give conditional approval. Alabama Ethics Opinion 83-135 (1983) says a lawyer may enter into a contingency fee agreement with a medical-legal consultant if, among other conditions, the consultant’s activities do not constitute unauthorized practice of law, and the fees paid the expert witness are not contingent on the outcome.

Two stage opinions—South Carolina Ethics Opinion 81-11 (1981) and Tennessee Ethics Opinion 85-F-101 (1985)—even allow the client to contract directly with a medical doctor so long as testimony would not be one of the services for which the doctor receives a contingent fee.

However, Illinois Ethics Opinion 86-03 (1986) holds that a lawyer may not hire a witness-finder agency that will pay the expert a fixed fee and then take a percentage of the outcome. Nor, the committee added, may the lawyer acquiesce to the client’s doing so.

In 1987 the ABA took up the question in Formal Opinion 87-354, which looked at an arrangement whereby a medical-legal consulting firm would provide an initial report, medical consultation and assistance with depositions and at trial. It would also make available expert witnesses and take a percentage fee, but pay the expert witness a flat fee.

The ABA found several problems, perhaps the most important being that the consultant retains too much authority over which and how many experts to use. Also, the client may commit to pay the consultant part of the recovery before the lawyer even knows what the expert witnesses will say or who they will be.

The ABA opinion relies on Model Rules of Professional Conduct 3.4(b), which forbids offering an "inducement" to a witness that is "prohibited by law", and 5.4(a), which forbids sharing fees with a nonlawyer . There are also problems under 5.4(c), which requires the lawyer to exercise independent judgement on the client’s behalf, and Rule 1.5, which requires a reasonable fee.

Recently, some states have taken an even more restrictive view. New York State Ethics Opinion 698 (1998) considered a case in which a consultant approached a lawyer with a potential malpractice client. He wanted the lawyer to take the case on a contingency basis, but also wanted to charge the potential client a separate contingency fee.

The consultant, an M.D./J.D., would help the lawyer evaluate the case, find and prepare expert witnesses, and prepare for cross-examination of opposing experts. For this, he customarily charged 5 percent to 10 percent of the award.

The opinion holds that a lawyer may not take the case if he has to promise to use that consultant. That arrangement would violate the rule against paying someone to recommend the lawyer’s employment.

But the kickback wasn’t the only problem. A consultant "with this degree of control over the client" may interfere with the lawyer’s independent professional judgement, the opinion says. Furthermore, the additional percentage fee may render the lawyer’s own fee excessive.

In Florida Ethics Opinion 98-1 (1998), a lawyer was contacted by a consulting service, which offered to pay a medical expert an hourly fee to review the medical records of the lawyer’s clients.

If it was found that any physicians did not meet the acceptable standard of care, the expert would provide an affidavit to that effect. The lawyer would be charged a contingency fee.

The ethical problem, says the opinion, is that the service requires the use of its own medical consultant. In Pennsylvania Ethics Opinion 95-79 (1995), the committee says the purpose of Rule 3.4(b) is "to assure that a court and jury will hear the honest conclusions of the expert unvarnished by the temptation to share in the recovery."

The opinion adds, "It’s true the medical consultant is not to be the witness, but who is to doubt that he will carefully shop his evaluation among prospective witnesses before selecting the expert whose conclusions most closely resemble his own?"

Lawyers should be careful when the fee they charge is not all their own.

Elizabeth J. Cohen is a lawyer in the ABA Center for Professional Responsibility. Reprinted by permission of the ABA Journal. © 2000, ABA Journal is publishing monthly by the American Bar Assoc.


Need an expert?
Need an ime?
New Worker's
Comp. Guidelines
in New York

Don't Take Experts
From Strangers

Bad Faith Experts
After Kumho

MRI of the Lumbar

Expert Witness

Federal Rules of

Medical Boards
Sample consulting
services agreement


expert witness package.Print / view an:
expert witness package.IME Sales Pkg.
expert witness package.Expert Join Pkg.
expert witness package.
expert witness package.Want to know more? See our Frequently Asked Questions.

JS Footer

Please note: Use of this site and its search engine constitute agreement with our Terms and Conditions.
Copyright © 2000-2020 JurisSolutions, Inc.
Questions or comments about this website: webmaster@JurisSolutions.com